<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAINTED Pet Food GRIPE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oprahshowcommentator.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/tainted-pet-food-gripe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oprahshowcommentator.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/tainted-pet-food-gripe/</link>
	<description>I'm a Forty-Something, Female Hypnotist In Southern California. I Will Review Oprah's Shows - Not All, Just The Ones That Impress Me Most.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teresa Holladay</title>
		<link>http://oprahshowcommentator.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/tainted-pet-food-gripe/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa Holladay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 20:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oprahshowcommentator.wordpress.com/2007/03/26/tainted-pet-food-gripe/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>If you think this is bad, it gets worse.  Menu Foods knew about animal deaths for almost a full month before they issued the recall. In fact, they did tests which they quickly started dumming down as &quot;tasting trials&quot; and 7 of 50 animals were dead within five days.  Is that acceptable?  Is that the norm?  And they waited yet another two weeks before saying anything. Check out the extremely thorough Scientific American article on my Safe Pet Food blog:  http://IsYourPetFoodSafe.com    It&#039;s quite an indictment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think this is bad, it gets worse.  Menu Foods knew about animal deaths for almost a full month before they issued the recall. In fact, they did tests which they quickly started dumming down as &#8220;tasting trials&#8221; and 7 of 50 animals were dead within five days.  Is that acceptable?  Is that the norm?  And they waited yet another two weeks before saying anything. Check out the extremely thorough Scientific American article on my Safe Pet Food blog:  <a href="http://IsYourPetFoodSafe.com" rel="nofollow">http://IsYourPetFoodSafe.com</a>    It&#8217;s quite an indictment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
